It is not entirely a futile thing to
do!
Quite a few depend on it to understand a dry text, when
the grasp of it is going to save their 'neck'...
They read it quite
a few times...
When this reading(blabber), is outwardly-silent...
the label does not get stuck to this person (but when dementia sets
in at old age, this blabber becomes a bit-pronounced, quite
inevitably)..
Blabber is not something indispensable... in
fact it is a deterrent to the spiritual progress!!!
Some people need to read something aloud, a
few times, to grasp what is written...
Few others yet... need
somebody to read it aloud to them a few times , to grasp... (tuition
master makes a living :)
The grasp, out of this blabber is
usually made up of ....
a fuzzy sense of what gets-made-out-of...
a group of words that makes a complete sense (Grammar calls it a
sentence)... and we use usually, the 'most' popular sense of the
word... (evidence is abundant when we seem to have lost the
conceptual sense of even a few common words, when we find 'Xerox' to
be much-more-meaningful than 'photocopying'... We can now proudly
declare 'Xeroxing'...
People love to talk to a computer
monitor...
plug earphones of a handset, and cheerfully blabber
to yourself (no scope for any misunderstanding, by an
onlooker!)...
A sample blabber of mine...
Somebody
answered a query about 'purpose' of a group (when people were an
assorted type)...
and somebody answered: “Like minded people's
to get the Hindu Nationalist news to update and discussion. ..”
This
answer gave scope for my blabber! :)
I reeled out:
“"to
get the Hindu Nationalist"
this is what the mind likes to say, as
a 'natural form of expression'.... (what seems closest to our
'feelings' about our togetherness as a 'culture' which inherited a
rich heritage!)...
The word 'Hindu' comes quite close to
'Nationalism', quite effortlessly!
(Yes, and this very word evokes a
'religious-polarisation' to quite a few, whether they like to
'express it openly or not'...
Somewhere, the 'popular sense' of the
word.. due to the way it is used ... overtakes our ability to
reach deeper that what it means due to its use (Xerox reaches faster
than a photocopy, though Xerox is a company that produces/produced
photocopying machines!)
The "problem" with those who
belong to the "ism" called 'Hinduism'... was two-fold!
1) They never needed a name for the
mere 'way of life' that they adopted, and only when other 'isms'
entered this land, a few centuries ago, they needed to distinguish
'themselves-from-us', and so they 'had-to' call us by 'some-name'....
The 'people on the other side of river-Indus, ... indu's or
H-indus... ' (how the name came about is not so important as....
whether we ourselves had given ourselves 'a' name... )...
Does it not feel so amazing, that we
never thought of a 'name' on 'religious-lines' to ourselves, even
though we had a very wide spectrum of cultural-varieties in our
life-style?(Life styles were broadly based on rituals and traditions
that suited the inner growth, and were also dependent on external
support!!!)... When one culture of one-area found it easy to
'look-at' why the neighbouring culture is a little different that
themselves,... the 'religions' that entered/invaded us did not pose
any problem of 'acceptance' (we looked at it as 'yet-another-culture'
and maybe they looked at us as yet-another-religion ,
which perhaps, "also-explains" why it was 'they' who had to
name-us ... as Hindus!)....
We used to refer to people as
'northerners/southerners' or... even pardesi(the desh which is
'different' from ours).... Even today, it is very common to notice
people around Kerala referring to people as 'southerners' of Kerala
(thekkan), while the whole of Kerala is a tiny strip of land!...
2)The spirit of 'nationalism'....
Even this aspect is a bit 'unique' to ancient people, when they never
attempted to even 'conceptualise' a 'nation'... What we find as the
binding factor amongst us (despite heavy cultural differences , even
'right-within' the Hindus-ourselves), ... is elusive for our own
grasp!!! I 'tried' ... or rather... attempted to ... come
close to this 'elusive' binding factor...
Let me use an example which is
'just-an-indicative-one'... to point a finger at: Suppose the crowd
of some 40 people are allowed to enter a hall where railway-tickets
are reserved at some 3 counters... Every pair of eyes of these 40
would take a look at these 3 counters, and 'look' for a 'human' being
at these counters... only one person is at one of the counters....
the whole 40 would rush to 'queue' in front of that counter... We
notice a 'unity' in the 'decision' to stand at that counter.. But
the logic is so-simple, that we fail to 'notice' the unity or
'unison' in their behaviour pattern (which is ....'choosing' to stand
only-in-front' of that-counter, where there is a person
ready-to-issue-tickets)...
Now , extending this 'sensibility'....
if we can look at ancient people (who were yet-without the name,
'Hindus'... ), we can also see why they chose 'individually' to stand
in the 'same queue' of 'way of life!... Tantric style of worship
suited the people of Kerala, while Mantric style suited yet others...
The whole of Kerala did not resort to 'tonsure' in the ancient
days, while the 'rest-of-India' found it useful to have a 'tonsure'
on certain occasions!... It is despite these sharp-differences that
we found a 'unifying factor'... (the unifying factor was... evolve
into the highest potential of being 'a-human'!)....
All this is my own 'ideas'...
perception... or whatever...
I found it so 'obvious' that the
'expression'..... "Hindu-Nationalist" seemed quite
'natural' due to the very nature of what remains as a 'residue-yet'
within us....
Now, it is a matter of choice, whether
we do-like or not... to firstly 'examine-thoroughly' and then ...
if found-sensible... pursue further, with or without
changes/alterations, to this concept!
(For me, ... as-of-now... this is an
ongoing process of understanding my own roots, with a preparedness to
re-examine my own-premises(basis), also on an on-going basis!
”
......
Unquote:
Now,
the “queue” that I had referred
to in the 'sample-blabber' of mine...
was an indicative
one...
Yes, ancients too seemed to be in a
'virtual-queue'....
today... Hindus themselves(leaving out the
exceptions!)... do not know why-at-all this queue is there?
At
some government premises, a very long queue is seen... Fresh
citizens take a look... and even as the 'thought' comes like this
“what is this queue about?”... they find the queue swelling by
another 20 feet (about 40 people added)... Now what?... First
scramble to stand in the queue... so that what ever the
'hell-it-is/was'.... we don't miss it due merely-to being tail-enders!
Now ask, the next bloke “hey what is it about?”... He says,
“dunno.... even I stood merely because it is a queue!!! Not all
are fools :)...” he declares proudly!
The queue that ancients decided to
stand into (not physically though)... may have been that of
'spiritual-path'!!! :))... :)
And 'religions'... only
happen to provide ... that spiritual evolvement as
quite-an-incidental benefit, while the purpose of 'grouping' was more
for a social order where ethics relating to a humane-orderliness
could not be codified into a 'general-law'!!!
Spirituality is
a subject matter of solicitation (like insurance)... Now, trying to
use that ancient way-of-life, very much like a 'religion' (for
whatever reasons), is for sure going to present numerable problems...
One such popular problem is... “Hey, why is it so hard to
demolish this religion(Hinduism), when even its own-followers are not
sincere about it?”... (this time, even the mere queuing-up does
bestow subtle benefits... can't be really helped!... But not
'entirely' without problems! Somebody asks, “Hey what kind of Gods
do you worship?.. The dad chops the head of his son, copy-pastes
the head of an elephant when the mom laments too-loudly... and all
these three are 'Gods' for you?”... The symbolism is not yet
within the grasp of the followers, what then to speak about
askers!... We love a 'pencil's story-autobiography', but can't grasp
that-of-a stone-idols... Obviously!!!. .. A pencil can be used,
and felt so-grossly... where as that stone-idol is a mute
spectator, so unresponsive at our sensory-levels :))....
)...
......
about “Blabber”....
the tool of
'chanting' ... the way it was undertaken in the ancient days... is
often misconstrued and likened with 'blabber-tool' of the present
day....
This, despite the ample hint “Shraddhavaam labhatey
gyanam...” by our 'Krish' of epic stories!... A contrast-quote was
provided by yet another giant, later on, (though to stress the very
same concept, but emphasizing the defects of a 'blabber'...) with
the words... “nahi nahi rakshati dukrnj karane.... Bhaja
govindam....” (blabber-style doesn't help)...
Patanjali asks too
briefly : are you free from helplessly-blabbering?... then , please
leave this place.. this book is not for you! (Chitta vritti
nirodhah)...
Blabberingly yours,
psn (26th September, 2015)