A few classmates of mine, during our
school days, used to boast about their ability to fool their
parents/elders at home, when they managed to read 'objectionable'
material right under their noses...!
These kids, pick a large size text
book, and place the prohibhited one inside it, inconspicously, and
enjoy watching the contents of the 'interesting' one inside the dull
one acting as their 'cover-agent'!
Some idiots get caught, when the
parents are a little alert for a moment (usually, at that parent-age,
they are drowned inside their worries, and require a
sledge-hammer-hit on their head, to get their attention focused into
the 'now')... when they are alert 'by chance' they notice that this
kid is unusually focused into this school-text book, and they peep
in... that kid gets caught... But smart ones, know this, and take
extra care to insert commercial breaks, asking the
dullness-evoking-queries to the elders who stray around them!
I was reminded of this incident, when I
read about the recent arrest of a cartoonist who was charged with
'sedition'!.... My doubt is... whether the charges are really
valid? Or is it that he simply removed the wrong label? A sizable
number of politicians are under cloud! A few of the legislators were
enjoying those 'pictures and images', while the assembly was in
session... Currency notes, bundles of it were displayed in the
parliament, as proof of payment for votes!
We have a nameboard of a temple, with
some Great Famous deity, and when somebody enters inside this shrine,
its occupants are demons, witches, etc (consecration was due long
since... that traditional 'kumbhabhishekam' or any ritual similar
to that appropriate to that deity, of that temple, that religion, was
long over due... and nothing to stop those negative kinds of
energies to dominate the place.... is the nameboard valid? Or, is it
misleading?.... Maybe the demons inside might use their clout to
retain that misleading nameboard to avoid exposure of truth, or to be
able to sustain with that wrong label!
Who has the authority to judge
?(irrespective of the competence!)
psn(11th September, 2012)
No comments:
Post a Comment