“Would you prefer to be told of your
errors, mistakes, shortcomings etc... by somebody who has no
authority to do so, and would therefore be a lot-more mild, kind,
gentle, friendly etc...
or
would you prefer it from the boss, who can inflict consequential penal action too, carry that memory(venom), in his memory for a long time?” I asked...
It was a 'chance' I took... to see...
if I can translate my desire ...
to make a difference in the life of the fellow next to me! (a fresher is a better victim! :))
or
would you prefer it from the boss, who can inflict consequential penal action too, carry that memory(venom), in his memory for a long time?” I asked...
It was a 'chance' I took... to see...
if I can translate my desire ...
to make a difference in the life of the fellow next to me! (a fresher is a better victim! :))
At work place... the 'book' says...
seniors ought to help the fellow seated next to him to get
acclimatized with the work-environment .... though the other might
be quite good at work... the psyche of the clientele differs a lot
from place to place.... For instance, at a village place, the
'attention' matters a little more! Tell them, 'Yep, we have
seen/sighted you... and even trust you to allow us a little time to
get the work done well' ... once they feel 'assured' of that
attention, a little delay means nothing-at all to them... On the
other hand, a busy client in a Metro city is only-concerned with
quick-delivery of his requirement, ... forget those 'courtesies'...
Regular and official 'audits' do not
contemplate such suggestions... they go by mere-checklists...
To gain that trust and confidence of my
fellow-worker... I had to present a 'school-type' of check list...
advantages and disadvantages along side :) .. Just to persuade him
to allow me the 'auditor's' role into his work...
A 'voluntary' audit... I told him... is....
A 'voluntary' audit... I told him... is....
- more genuine
- the presentation of errors, weaknesses, strength-areas to be further strengthened, etc are better-presented
- the effort to make it 'more appealing' is there (official auditor hardly bothers what the victim would 'think' about such harsh observations)
- it is more acceptable... since it is voluntary... not a mandated checklist which may be outdated/irrelevant/impracticable/etc
- it is coupled with a 'solution' often... auditors leave the 'battle-it-out' to higher up's with just saying 'what is not okay'...
- it is 'more-timely'... the rectification is earlier, when damages leave a deeper scar, with official audits
- introspection is there with the person who undertakes voluntary audit... he is inside the game, not a mere referee who doesn't need to win-or-lose :))
- fosters that 'inclusiveness'... it is not a case of point-out-defect and just run-away!
- Builds honesty and mutual trust ... something that a 'casual' visitor (official auditor) hardly even-looks-at
- on going corrective measures ... just happen along side :)
Usually, they do take the 'bait'...
and then a 'bond' gets established...
The 'probation' period of a fresher
sails reasonably smooth...
Hey!
I thought... then it 'ought' to have
been there in the ancient times!
Oh!... since the very 'priority' of a lifestyle was towards spiritual-evolvement... this 'audit' factor too was heavily shrouded, camouflaged... perhaps ... And that led me to focus a little more into it... That explained the 'flexibility' that was in built in those 'sutras' the thread... which accommodated flowers of a broad-spectrum!
Oh!... since the very 'priority' of a lifestyle was towards spiritual-evolvement... this 'audit' factor too was heavily shrouded, camouflaged... perhaps ... And that led me to focus a little more into it... That explained the 'flexibility' that was in built in those 'sutras' the thread... which accommodated flowers of a broad-spectrum!
Audibly yours,
psn(28th January, 2016)