We are basically entertainment seekers
This blog might disappoint π
Readers are advised to exercise caution, similar to reading a ‘notice' for AGM of a corporation, without any ‘explanatory notes’ π…
This blog has many loose ends π
In 1970 or so, I was surprised to see a movie being released in morning show π³
After seeing the movie, i got the answer π ( dosage of entertainment is below the minimum requirement of masses π)
( Chandramohan jain whispered his question, not shouted to the speaker, π. He knew the 'nature' of audience π. )
Imagine Rajnikant/Amitabh ( even devAnand ) replicating the boxing/wrestling world championship style against villain π. Audience will be bored to death.
I was 'eagerly' awaited by my cousins in Kerala during summer holidays. Even after 15 days' stay with each gang, they request 'stay one more week π'. ( Now, it is 2 decades since I visited them. They don't 'miss' me π. Instead, they feel relieved π. I don't entertain π, of late π₯).
Remove the frills from crowd_rituals and improve the bare_vedic part, and see if people 'attend' with the same number? π (The frills obscured the purpose of attendance itselfππππ)
Exceptions are everywhere and in everything π. ( Jaggi's third program is a total contrast to the first basic yoga programs, in terms of entertainment. π .... Still, a good number come. ΰ€Έिΰ€°्ΰ€«़, the 'good' in the number is from the 'large' of 8 basic program of 10 placesπ₯π).
Seminars are popular today, only because the organisers sacrificed the intrinsic meaning of the word 'semen' in the adapted_concept behind selection of the audience π. The main_purpose of 'seminar' is irrelevant nowπ
Patanjali’s yoga sutras( the book) is rarely read. Among the readers very rarely understood. Within those who understood, very few practiced it π₯. It is not popular, but antique, and therefore survives today. The ‘preservation’ part is owing to earliest readers who attributed reverence by themselves_becoming a product of that monumental bookπ. Today it is a most boring book for today's minds, in its bare form without any explanation π
Tersely yours,
psn(20 June, 2026)
No comments:
Post a Comment