We have really very good experts to talk about “economics”
I am sure about myself that I ain't one of them.
But then, great economists miss the emotional aspects often, unless they are better in spirituality than their supremacy in economics π.
The 3 basic sectors, we know, ( since it is we–human minds–who defined them, not nature, not the cosmos, or what we call as divinity ), are primary, secondary and tertiary. Logic and reasoning are applicable in dealing with these 3.
Primary is almost governed by nature. Secondary is driven by necessity, whereas the tertiary is flexible enough to promote evolvement of human beings basically, and for which, we also look at the betterment of the first two.
Spirituality enhances the emotions of inclusiveness in us and therefore, it can help the ‘health’ of tertiary sector better. ( Historical evidence can convince us, that tertiary sector developed the least, wherever the inclusiveness could_not_thrive on its own, in human beings π. Desert culture couldn't afford the growth of tertiary, for obvious reasons of survival priorities owing to lack of support from primary sector. The converse is not true. Abundance in the potential for the primary sector to grow, did not guarantee the proportionate growth of the secondary and tertiary, as we can see in the primitive humans cultures where the nature is bountiful in African wilderness).
Bharat, as a culture has set a very high benchmark of something like 42% GDP a few centuries ago, and thus providing us an opportunity to understand the importance of functional aspects of these 3 sectors, with a decisive role of tertiary sector, though the desert proves logically that primary sector decides the growth of other twoπ(Chanakya, was the economist, during this brief phase).
Certain ‘values’ held in Bharat, is still a distant dream for other cultures π. An example is, we define economic growth with a term “samruddhi” ( the phrase “all round prosperity“ comes closest to translate “samruddhi” in English π). Economic prosperity has milder terms in desi lingua π( like sampann… “wealth & prosperity”, a little less than “all round”).
It took me a long time to grasp the “subtle” correlation between two dissimilar fields of human activities, to understand the secret of using the Yardstick of “fine arts” for measuring the level of economic prosperity of a culture π³π³….,π₯π₯π₯…and then “π€π€” wondering about it.
The Yardstick is “wherever the 64 fine_arts thrive, we can call it a culture of Samruddhi” π. ( The explanation part, is too vast to contain into the confines of a blog like thisπ€£π)
Spiritual growth holds a magical wand. It can afford a samruddhi in exclusivity of the ‘number’ game of a populace, where even the ‘bulk’ of the society is trapped heavily in the vice_grip of materialistic temptations of a mind π. Bharat is a land of spiritual destination. Obviously, this ‘miracle’ of exclusivity of samriddhi can happen only here. ( My question on a form “Yahoo answers” was based on this subtle concept. The brief part of the question ran like this: “What makes Indians flourish despite obstacles like corruption, brain drain, poverty and population crisis?”
A question seeking a spiritual sense in an answer addressing the lack of economic infrastructure needed for economic prosperity π. ( Secret of exclusivity for inclusiveness π)
Prosperously yours,
psn(6th Dec., 2025)
Post script : Bharat is undergoing a ‘phenomenon’ presently, defying logic, when a spiritual person like Shri N.D.Modi, is spearheading as a PM, the task of Re-defining the tertiary sector of Bharat, using the ancient tools of spiritual Bharat π π. He knows, spiritual growth is an integral part of tertiary sector, when Samruddhi is the goal, not merely economic-wealth. ( Of course, I am entirely responsible for this statement, of mine)

No comments:
Post a Comment