Atheism
Google(search) says: Denote refers to the literal, dictionary definition of a word, while connote refers to the implied or associated ideas and feelings a word suggests beyond its primary meaning. For example, a rose denotes a specific type of flower but connotes love, romance, or beauty.
If the foregoing is acceptable, then…. The word “Brahma” is used as connotation and denotation, both!๐
People often_think of only_the denote, in the personified_form(a deity with the attribute of a human form with 4 heads, 5th one got chopped off!) in Brahma. They miss the “romance” in ‘brahma”, referred in the primary one of the 4 declaratory truths ( pragnanam Brahma)
The base of Hinduism is the 4 declaratory truths. It stood the test of time, welcoming atheists of all-sorts to deny it ( these 4 truths are not any kind of connotation or denotation, like the word “God”. Worst disadvantage is, these 4 are experiential truths, unavailable for a grasp through communicable words or emotions ๐)
Atheism finds its existence only in the lack of experience of connoted_verbal_forms, referred by theists.
Honest atheists need courage, in its highest form. Historically, spiritual Gurus are EVER on the ‘lookout’ for genuine atheists. Genuine or honest atheists are measured by the INTENSITY_LEVEL. Courage becomes their ‘tool’ to lead them into liberation/moksha! Courage ( to be a staunch, honest, genuine and powerfully_intense atheist) happens to be more formidable one, than all_other_tools in spirituality ๐.
Convenience of being an atheist is ironically
the_most_popular form of fake_atheism ๐
Escapism works in the connotation of fake_atheism, and is very effective in confusing non_intense_theists. ( Popular quotes by famous political_atheists works as powerful ‘tool-kits’ to convert gullible folks to ‘believe’ into their atheist-ideology( not even worth as a ‘philosophy’; just_an ideology ๐).
Dishonest atheism suits cleverness, cunningness and all such PARASITICAL traits. They bring disrepute to genuine atheists( who adhere to Ethics, better than believers๐). Almost like, imperfect criminals who get caught, cause a disrepute to highly skilled criminals, who demonstrate that crime can also be perfect๐( only the ‘karma’ of a crime is unavoidable, in a perfect crime. Otherwise, it's a win_win thing๐). Whereas, unlike a perfect_crime, a perfectionist in atheism is faster than believers into the Ultimate human possibility, that is Liberation/moksha ๐…( a true atheist, is an atheist for his personal reasons, not to propagate it ๐. He might even ‘pose’ like a believer, to avoid embarrassing his near & dear ones๐)
I don't know if….
Theism connotes only a ‘belief’ and doesn't imply a living experience of those 4 truths. In which case, the liberated ones TRANSCEND the classification itself, as theists or atheists. ( Example: DNA test has obviated the ‘need’ to be a theist about Mr. X , being my biological dad๐. Likewise, I ‘know' I have a pair of hands, and I am typing this with it, so I don't ‘need any belief's that I have two hands! Genuine seekers, that_way, turn as Ex-theists, once they ‘experience’ these 4 MahaVahyas๐. )
Aadi Shankara established the 4 mutts, not for propagating any theism, andf…….not in the least, to engage into mass_conversion from atheism, BUT only with the purpose of making the 4 truths better_reachable to all the humans ( no matter what they believe or disbelieved in๐)
Ex yours,
psn(17 Sept 2025)
No comments:
Post a Comment