Search This Blog

Saturday, June 21, 2025

Silly doubts

 Sheer apprehension about 'how long can a blog be?'  persuaded me to shift to another page. ( Otherwise, my stupidity in asking silly questions to others might end only when I am brain-dead๐Ÿ˜ญ) earlier one was "silly questions"


1)we breathe (by default, unless we 'take a fancy for doing it CONSCIOUSLY)

Do our lungs actually say to air "Welcome, dear O² enriched air" or, does our lungs gasps for air, in dire_necessity?  

An asthmatic struggles only to inhale, why? If it were about elasticity, even exhalation needs a 'struggle' isn't it?( We squeeze out the toothpaste tube! Ah! Latest tubes are one_way elastic๐Ÿ˜œ like bribe_TAKERS. they struggle to give bribe willingly)

2)why is it that this phrase “inteligent choice” is used very rarely, now-a-days?( A negative Example ๐Ÿ˜ญ : in the banking industry, during 1995, bulk of employees & management, alike, chose the PF against Pension as a right_choice, paisa_wise๐Ÿ˜œ.  Later, wisdom dawned. Pension proved to be better. Both parties resisted against each other, about a “second time for CHOOSING”. A deal was struck for a price. Employees surrendered a FAT sum to opt for penShun๐Ÿ˜œ)

Does really the intellect NEEDS to be allowed to make an intelligent-choice, instead of our DEAR MIND?

3)why do we patronise, pamper and nourish “HURT”? ( Words CANNOT cause injury, except when it is hurled at us with authority+power, like a termination order, unjustified judgement by a judge etc…. )

Injuries are inevitable at physical level, but hurt is entirely our_creation, ain't it?๐Ÿ™

4)why don't we use the choice we have to ‘try' and transcend our basic defects?( Sorry, an irritant question this is๐Ÿ™).

A fisherman asked a saint, seeing that saint rescuing a scorpion the 3rd time, though it stung the very hand( of the saint that rescued! Pain of sting, the hand trembled, and scorpion fell into the flowing river……

The saint looked into the_innocence in the eyes of that poor fisherman and chose_to answer:”well, it is the nature of the scorpion to sting, and it is now in my nature to save. Both of us are acting according to our_own_nature” ( my take from this story: I CAN change even my embedded software ( basic nature), but I need to decide to try๐Ÿ˜œ๐Ÿ™)

5)why do we brand/label any question as “tough/out_of_syllabus/stupid/irrelevant/etc”….. just because we don't know the answers?

( I asked a B.Sc. with physics _main “can we find AC type of electricity occuring naturally?? And that person got angry๐Ÿ˜ญ…. Lightening is natural, not man_made and carries an electric charge of minimum 17000 volts๐Ÿ˜“….  Such natural AC? Wrong to ask?๐Ÿ™๐Ÿ˜ฅ)

6) a quarrel-some doubt ๐Ÿง 

Why is it that both,    the deity himself and their devotees are a stark-contrast to each other, in their appearances, paraphernalia, rituals, display of grandeur, wealth etc? Shiva and Vishnu. ( the “why” of it is the irksome thing, not the agreement about the contrast! ๐Ÿ˜œ)

7)What kind of thoughts get rooted about us, in the minds of those with whom we interact in our life? ( If, there is a ‘belief’ in the perpetuity of some like “soul, atma, rooh, etc, that would also ‘carry’ such IMPRESSIONS about me, and accordingly, bless-or-curse me isn't it? ๐Ÿ˜œ) . Among all kinds of opinions, judgements, assessments, assumptions and presumptions etc about me, ONLY the Residues matter isn't it? Not the fleeting thoughts, of temporary relevance?

While alive, it is their thoughts about me which vibe around me๐Ÿ™๐Ÿ˜“, for good or bad๐Ÿ˜œ

8)what can be a “scientifically” valid reason, for being a very ETHICAL person in life?( Not quite an easy or simple answer. Why does it make sense ? how can it make sense, to “live” by values in life? 


“Dharma”, dhaarmic_life is a term popularised since times immemorial ๐Ÿ™. 

And today, look at the “nature” of the individuals who denounce Sanatan Dharma ๐Ÿ˜œ. Why are they irked by existence of those who choose to live a bit_ethically?  

Clarity can be ONLY via understanding about the scientific_utility/advantage of adherence to ethics. Advantage to exactly_WHO inside us? Body, organ called brain, fictional/subtle entity called mind/intellect, or, the subtlest fellow called “being”?)

9)Can we use discretion Judiciously, unless our sense of Discrimination has been used at its Best¿?( Judges in a court exercise discretion rarely, but we use it all our waking hours, unawares_probably๐Ÿ˜œ. Our thoughts?)

10) is it true that, the organ brain serves 2 masters? 1.requests from neuros, stomach etc, 2) mind's dictates ? 

If true, which is better? 1) overload the brain with our whimsical mind, or 2) prioritise the 'health' of our brain with 'some' sensibility in mind's commands to the poor brain?๐Ÿ˜œ

11) a junk_food item( any item, bajji, aaloo bonda, samosa, etc) dripping with oil, we eat holding it in our bare hands.

That oily palm, now needs a soap even, not just_water, to get rid of the smear of oil. 

Same item, from same palm of our hand doesn't leave even a ‘trace’ of oiliness inside our mouth ๐Ÿ˜ณ๐Ÿ˜ณ๐Ÿ˜ณ. Why?๐Ÿค”๐Ÿค”๐Ÿค” ( A very close person, hearing this ‘SILLY’ doubt from me, tried “saliva” ๐Ÿ˜‚ as answer. Only till I asked “, okay then, smear your Saliva liberally inside your palm and eat. Can you Guarantee that palm will be oil/grease smear_free?. )๐Ÿ™

12) why do ‘desi’ guys of ancient India respond even to a Sneeze by somebody around? 

The ‘hint’ is no_big secret ๐Ÿ˜‚

The phenomenon is a sacred thing, hence a secret๐Ÿ™

The ancients didn't miss EVEN a Sneeze, as a tool, towards the purpose of life๐Ÿ˜œ( howzzat!)

The west was a bit modest about ‘utilising’ the_sneeze; they merely murmur a ‘bless you’ to that ๐Ÿคง sneezer. Desi guys sophisticated it, being evolved, owing to the ‘hindu way of life ๐Ÿ™’ . Here in the south the response was a heavily_accentuated “Hari_hee!!!”. 

Isn't it a ‘silly doubt’ now? Now that we decided to discard the response_mechanism?

13) why do we end up, pampering our own children so much, that….the poor teacher Surely fails in teaching 'discipline’ ( which is the_most essential ingredient for learning)? The kid very_naturally looks at a teacher as a ‘very cruel ‘ person if that teacher gives excercises to do, homework, and such effective tools of learning???  

Are we not doing a same_side_goal???? ๐Ÿ˜œ

Paying fees for the teacher's salary, and the same time, putting HURDLES in the teacher's way ????

The JOKE is, even_that_teacher does the same thing with their_children๐Ÿคฃ๐Ÿคฃ๐Ÿคฃ

( Wrong koschan? )

14)why don't we get to see, women folk singing, while transplanting saplings of rice ( all kinds of garbage is viral on WhatsApp ๐Ÿ˜ณ)

I tried to tell my mind “why such silly koschans? What is in it for YOU?๐Ÿ˜ก”

My mind : hey bro…. Cool. Women singing, infuse positive Vibes, into the tender saplings. You benefit, not me, uuuuu rice-eater! And moreover, your addiction to U-rice( like U-pvc doors/pipes) is healthy.

My 'in-it' is….healthy mind in a healthy baadee/body๐Ÿคฃ”

My Quixotic mind, never-mind

๐Ÿ™

15)why don't they teach school kids about the nature of different subjects of science?

Today, I casually asked a techie, with 5 years of experience, “between physics and chemistry, which one is More abstract? (Abstract concepts need deeper focus and attention to learn, for a student ๐Ÿ™. Teacher ought to make them aware of how a subject is going to be! Maths, touches all aspects of human activity, hence it deserves dedicated learning)

Am I wrong ๐Ÿ™

๐Ÿ˜ฅ


16) (เคทोเคกเคถ) likely to irritate ‘only' those who believe in the efficacy of Sanskrit 'chant'/mantra ๐Ÿ™

Silly koschan : the priest/preceptor/Upadhyay/Purohit/vadhyar, who chants every syllable, in order to facilitate the gruhastha/yajamaan/doer of the rituals, doesn't get ‘affected’ either ways, if the chants are likely to ‘actualise’ it's purpose ( exampull: “I repeat a chant, invoking my dead father, after that guide prompts me. Of course, I specify my dad's name as well in few places. But what if his_dad too scrambles/huddles with his subtle presence as well?” ( Some way ought to be there to insulate the priest isn't it? Even in a temple, chants hardly “misfire” on the priest!๐Ÿ˜œ. ) This doubt is irrelevant, if the chants do_not adhere to the Quantum laws๐Ÿ™.

 


No comments: