Unofficial Vow
Traditionally a vow is understood as “a formal and serious promise (especially in a religious ceremony)”.
My ultiKhopdi (ultikhopdi is a Hindi word, more apt about me, to describe “quixotic” mind in English) … my quixotic mind is unable to come out of the ‘observation’ that a few guys around, when they ‘knowingly’ engage into doing something that is a negative act unto themselves, and they do it repetitively, I am irreversibly compelled to view it as a vow! ππ. Like somebody habituated to utter nonsense and very routinely says a “sorry” soon after— is he under a ‘vow’ ? He knows “sorry” is NOT an apology π. It's like “sorry to hear that you failed in your examination π”----nothing to apologise to the otherπ€£.
Eating ‘junk’ food, is like an unofficial vow “I shall do everything possible to make my doctor rich π”
Manufacturing tension, hypertension, even about a situation where we know that it is an inevitable outcome of our own past routine, seems like a vow “I undertake to remain stupid, and therefore I need to create tension within π. I have to avoid sensibility, which is unavoidable if I remain relaxed_while_ALERT ππππ”
I couldn't ‘contain’ it within myself, this stupid curiosity “are they under an unofficial vow, to patronise absence of intelligence?π€”. How can I ask someone directly, “are you observing a Vow Sir? That you will avoid sensibility?” π³. He would get angry! If my curiosity “gets the better of me” …. I try something like “why am I haunted by a negative thought that you are capable of doing this better????... I can see that you are already doing your bestπ” Safe question.
I thought, let me compile my “silly questions” and take a safe_risk π ( if it is safe, where is the risk?... I am trying ‘a’ stupidityπ). A blog “silly questions”...and a follow on… as “silly doubts”. Stupendous successπ. No responses to convince me that I am wrong about unofficial vow π.
Ideally, “quality questions” from a student is a sure hint for the teacher to know “this kid is a potential candidate for high speed growth of intelligence π. But, the volume of syllabus is a deterrent to encourage questions in a modern classroom. Exam-Scores are proportional to expertise in ‘copypaste technology’π. By_heart + vomit it in the examination ( again a ‘kind of unofficial vow by the fraternity of academia —” we shall not allow intellect to be nurtured”)
The widely misconstrued version of “freedom is a fundamental right” suits damn well, such unofficial vows of self_destruction. Nuclei families are shrinking further into living separately together, even within a pair of parents & just a kid π. No intrusion into others mindset ππ
Unpromisingly yours,
psn(19 Oct 2026)
No comments:
Post a Comment