A.I. is brain, not intellect
A very close friend searched for difference between asheervad and Anugrah ( blessings and benediction)
A.I. responded with
Quote: Aashirwad (ΰ€ΰ€Άीΰ€°्ΰ€΅ाΰ€¦) is a Hindi word meaning 'blessing' or 'good wishes'. It's often used to express goodwill or a positive sentiment towards someone.
Anugraham (ഠനുΰ΄്ΰ΄°ΰ΄Ήം) is a Malayalam word that also means 'blessing' or 'grace'.
While both words convey a similar meaning, there's a subtle difference in connotation:
- Aashirwad often implies a more active or intentional act of blessing or wishing well.
- Anugraham typically carries a sense of divine or unconditional grace, often implying a more passive or benevolent act.
In everyday usage, both words are used interchangeably to express goodwill or blessings.
Would you like to explore more words or their cultural context?”
And he added : “AI response.”
Unquote.
My reply to my friend:
Quote
Exactly π
A.I. responds with only that data which is 'fed' into it.
But it does a "good job" ...collecting the pattern from a randomised data π
The human brain" is doing the "A.I." job.....(Whereas Human "intellect" is entirely different from A.I. π.... ΰ€Άाΰ€―ΰ€¦ , A.B. ΰ€्ΰ€―ाΰ€¦ा ΰ€ ीΰ€ ΰ€Ήोΰ€ा . Artificial brain π)
Though not an exact definition.....
A relatable example,
Where a "functional sample" of human intellect can be seen π...is in a popular story = Valmiki conceived+ wrote Ramayana, before it happened (ππ... ΰ€¦ृΰ€·्ΰ€ा, ΰ€ͺांΰ€ΰ€΅ां ΰ€ͺ्ΰ€°ΰ€ाΰ€° ΰ€ा teacher, ΰ€िΰ€Έΰ€Έे ΰ€Έिΰ€°्ΰ€« "ΰ€ुΰ€°ु" ΰ€Ήी ΰ€ΰ€ͺΰ€° ΰ€Ήै π)
Unquote
We average minds refer to our memories most of the time, and our brain processes only the data fed into it.
When the “mind” is the boss, the brain obligates only the mind. π
The brain is “accustomed” to become inactive, when the mind is not in the chair of a boss π ( Nature alerts the brain, only in an emergency…. ). Deep-sleep state is an example.
Who inside me, is the listener, the experiencer, the receiver of data_input, matters π (a great being explained it with the acronyms BMI→PFT→OET)....
Identification of the ‘who’ is only after a grasp of the distinction between terms like brain, mind, intellect, memory, imagination, emotions of both types, and the beingπ
Paradoxically, who inside me is “trying to understand” the ‘Who_Is_Who” decides the accuracy of the graspπ ( like the old joke: a native vaidya/doctor suggested “ this youth is mad. Only a marriage can restore his normal mental health “.... the paradox is, unless his madness is cured, no bride will marry him, and unless he gets a bride, his madness is incurable)
Brainily yours,
psn( 3 Apr 2026)