misinterpretation of Dharma
Is it not time_enough that we rectify the most popular mis'interpretation of ancient advisories in sanskrit ( handed down to us from millenniums, and hence viewed as time testedπ)
When the "text" could not be tampered, cunning minds resorted to popularizing a deliberately misinterpreted meaning π.
We might argue "well, I am NOT going to even touch it.... So, I am not affected by misinterpretation π".
Such escapists are its worst victims.
*_the goal was to render the Minds susceptible to any other misinterpretation as well_* π
The "ability" to discern, distinguish and discrimination is sought to be crushed π
Famous quotes:
1)Atithi devo bhav
2)Matru/pitru/acharya, devo bhav
These two are addressed to whom?
Popular version:
1)Treat your guest like a God!( Pamper, please, trust that incursionist as well, if he poses like a ‘guest’ π… )
2) Treat your parents and teachers like your Gods, (no matter if they are actually an idiot, or devilish criminals π)
Somehow….. do we not find flaws, defects, or atleast difficulties and self-inflicted damaged, in blindly following the misinterpretation, merely because these interpretations are popular????
Not requiring too_much knowledge of Sanskrit, can we afford ourselves to make a simple comparison with other EQUALLY popular and VERY SIMILAR quotes, with tamper-proof interpretation???
a) Ayushman bhava
b)Sowbhagyavati bhava
c)putravati bhava
d)yashasvi bhava
Who is the “addressee” in these a)-to-d) ???
“May You be”... As a suffix to variable “long-lived/fortunate/with_vhildren/famous “
“Bhava” is “may you be” and not “be treated as” π…. Here is the ‘catch’
If
1) atithi devo is “may you be like(behave like)” instead of “may you be TREATED like( by a gullible_fool)”...
2) mom/dad/teacher devo is “may you be like(behave like)” instead of “may you be TREATED like( by a small kid, utterly innocent, too small to be burdened with a Heavy load like “Treat your dad/mom/teacher as_if they are your God π‘π‘)”...
then,
the addressee gets rectified and interpretation SUSTAINS without any collateral damage, caused π
Most importantly,
we get trained into a “rational thinking” …which really matters π
Bhavami Yours only, ( may I be, yours)
psn (12 Feb, 2026)
Anti-disclaimer: Obviously, I am morally duty bound to accept any Valid criticism for my attempt to persuade a refinement in ourselves, using a flawed argument if any π
Punch: I am quite UNAPOLOGETIC about one thing, for sure…. Come what mayπͺ!!
I shall respect only elderliNess (of any age, even a kid), and not Elders( by age alone, bereft of any wisdom) beCause even a donkey agedπ.
No comments:
Post a Comment