Actually, my idea is to simplify the confusion that confounds youngsters when 'something' very strange overpowers their 'normalcy' of psyche 🤣
No harm in trying out my idea, even if am wrong, even if my idea is flawed. With little patience, a reader can realise by himself that all I did was to demystify the traditional litmus test a_bit.
Thirst hangs on till it gets satiated ( embedded software in the human machine 🙏)
Yes, thirst is normally satiated by gulping water🙏 But think of a situation where, a person feeling very thirsty walking under Sun in a desert, is somehow teleported to the inside of a huge freezer machine, which is at Minus 20 degrees centigrade? The body does a reassessment of the Ratio of the Level of its Hydration-needs inside that freezer and declares "Buddy, I ain't no longer any thirsty👍... Forget about drinking watchar/water" (a far fetched imagination, over_exaggeration to "sell" the idea that "satiation" is exclusive of any object(here, water) 🙏
Let's try to demystify "UNCONDITIONAL love" as a standard Yardstick/parameter for TRUE love.
Rewrite it as "true love NEVER seeks a satiation" Does it not sync with satiation as a "conditional love?"
Satiation can be 'as simple as' a psychological or emotional satiation ( satisfaction). Still, this satiation is a condition.
A love that doesn't seek any kind of satiation, is far unlikely to die down. It doesn't get extinguished ( for want of any fuel). It simply responds to the situation, if okay. It doesn't FLARE up as a violent REACTION to any excessive fuel from the situation 🤣
Criticism is welcome 🙏
But please beware of disclosing any test_results, if a reader decides to use this litmus test. Your love is your private "affair". I have no bijness to know about it 🙏
Lovingly yours,
psn(24 March, 2026)
No comments:
Post a Comment