I am so sorry!
The title itself... or..
'Even the title'.... suggests, that what follows is likely to be
untrustworthy!
So, let us just have a
'relaxed' look at it... Let us decide to just entertain ourselves,
taking care, not to get stuck too much into it, such that it does not
confuse us at all!
So, does it now seem, this
time, that my disclaimer, my suggestion, looks like : We can trust
the 'confusion-about-trust?'... (some of us are so sure, by now,
they would agree, thus: “I fully trust, that there is bound to be
a confusion now, in the offing!”... Hey, to get rid of confusions,
out of our life, which way is it going to work?.. Avoiding
confusions? Or getting rid of confusions? But how?.. meeting the
very source of 'our-confusions', up rooting it for good, once for
all... etc! Not running away from 'talk-about-confusions'... but
meeting it head-on, tenaciously!)
When ever somebody says,
'Trust me'... is it not going to 'firstly' cause a mild
confusion... only when... the doubts-created-by-such-confusion, does
not find a 'reasonable answer'... suspicion creeps in!
The lady of the house
decides to drive a car... (it is almost a fashion in the west, not to
'trust-her-driving-pattern'... at least the several jokes we get to
hear, seem to suggest.. statistically, it may not be too scary....
Hey, why am I substantiating such a mild statement? It is about
confusions-of-trust, not about trustworthy-trust!)
The King loved the monkey,
and (therefore, perhaps) the king trusted the monkey... The King
was fast asleep... a fly landed on King's nose... the King
stirred... the monkey noticed it... The monkey decided, to 'guard'
the sleeping-king, from fly-menace (it did not find any scope to even
'consider a possible-monkey-menace').. it tried to ward off that
fly... the fly persisted, shifting just the landing ground (neck,
chest, arms, nose, forehead, etc of that king!)... Anger crept into
the monkey (but the source of anger was... 'Love for king' so says
the story... but from monkey's perception, it may just be a
'sense-of-loyalty' at best, or at worst... 'insurance-policy' for
the bananas provided by the king, when it has 'noticed' the King
ordering “Mere bandar ke liye, Best-tasty, fresh, latest banana
lao!' )...
the fly by now, was not
just a 'fly-by-night' affair... it has come to stay, flying (like
FDI in aviation!).. the monkey got 'wild' by now! (wild is its
'home' any way!... and when it is 'at home' of its own, trust shifts
into its own 'home-grown-traits'!)... It picked up the sword, and
aimed at the fly, now sitting near the neck... Swishhh! The fly
escaped, and the King now 'slept-off' for good!
So, some antidotes that
are likely to be effective ... (use logic... what else can we hope
to have!)
List it out:
1)Integrity trust (not,
accuracy-trust-- count the cash even from a trusted-cashier)
2)Garbage trust
(computers, maintain very high level of integrity, when we
consciously maintain awareness that it is 'virtual-garbage'...
looking thus, we are warned of sleeping virus, latent bugs,
memory-location-fallibility, data-packet-erosion, ... why, even the
.... sleep-quota-deficiency of 'system-Admin-Sir'
3)Accuracy trust
('Bait-money'... offered by police, crime-investigators, Anti-bribe
squad etc... they make no mistake, listing out every bit of details
so well, that even the victims manage to guess, “hey! This looks
too good to be real enough to quietly loot!”)
4)Inaccuracy trust (Some
people are famous to do it only the 'other way'.. so tell them the
opposite of what is needed by them... I don't know, here I am
confused, whether to call it opposite-trust or negative-trust!)
5)Time trust (time takes
care of all problems! We even mistrust those bhoot-bangla... but
never heard of a 2500 year old ghost!.. these ghostly people
re-surface, waiting only up to say 4 generations, 'max'... Maybe
the ghostly-aspects might wear off, or rot, by then!... does it mean,
even ghosts are time-bound?... I am confused... Some ghosts
maintain punctuality about appearance, but their 'shelf-life'?
Use-up before 4 generations? Maybe, other ghosts 'eat-them-up'..
scrambled/boiled!
6)Atheist trust-- This
is a very controversial kind of trust... Can we trust an atheist?...
'Hey, atheism itself is about 'mistrust'... or its
negative-varieties... sorry, positive varieties (negative for
trust.. not mistrust.. minus-into-minus is plus, in maths, but
trust?(dunno!)...
7)Dowry trust -- (better
divide trust into installments! Sorry, the 'trust-money'... lest it
ends up as 'ali-mony'!)
8)Blog trust --- Take a
few 'too-good-to-be-original' sentences, the key words, and 'google'
it... Not a very good 'insurance', if a person is good at 'goofing
up the text-words' without mutilating the meaning... but... hey!..
that means (does it not?), that he is damn good at the concept, and
has grasped it... trust his brains, not the intention to get a
prize, somehow!
9)Perception trust--- No
way to even trust it, till we have a few notches up, ourselves, into
that perception! (otherwise, it is just monkey-business!)
10)Blind trust-- babies
'seem' to trust us blindly!... Infatuated-emotions seek to trust
blindly (fake-lovers are the beneficiaries).. Computer-illiterate
feel better to trust the fallibility of an emotion-less machine,
rather than the motionless-bureaucrat, hence e-governance!
11)Sentiment/Superstition
trust --- (eleven is an auspicious number.. no other reason for me
to reach only this far!)... Trust-not-me... but beware of my
superstitious nature, when that takes over, I am worse than a maniac!
(we hear about psycho-killers, whose pattern is to be trusted first,
in order to 'guess' that next likely victim, and then to nab.... we
have 'shifting-superstitions' with gadgets getting outdated too
fast!)...
If the list doesn't seem
to grow, then something else is growing within us, subtly,
clandestinely... let us call it 'unconditional-trust'!
Unconditionally-conditioned,
yours,
psn(22nd September, 2013)
No comments:
Post a Comment